IT WOULD BE WONDERFUL IF SOMEONE COULD GIVE US A CLEAR answer to the
question “Who’s in Charge?” The government’s mishandling of the basic
functions such as the distribution of basic foods at a reasonable price
is raising the question in the minds of many millions of Indonesians.
The government has instituted some sound and sensible
programs. Over the past three years it has been able to put together
sound guidelines for infrastructure development, and for the creation of
special economic zones (SEZ), to name just two.
The decision to curtail imports of expensive kerosene
as a fuel for domestic cooking stoves and replace it with cheaper
compressed natural gas (CNG) was also sensible and pragmatic.
Yet none of these programs have gone anywhere. In the
most recent example of policy failure, the botching of the conversion
program from kerosene to CNG is an indictment of the government’s
ability to manage.
As government to continues to fail in what be believe
are basic managed and marketing functions, our question at GlobeAsia is
changing. What we now have to ask is: Why is no-one in charge in the
government?
The government’s role in securing basic food supplies –
sembako, as they are known in Indonesian – is a complex one and subject
to many factors, with major factors such as high international prices
out of the hands of the government itself.
However the clumsy meddling by the government for the
past year in attempts to restrain the price of cooking oil represent a
failure in decision making. Now, after a year of high prices in the
market, the government has finally decided it will subsidize the price
of cooking oil for the poor.
To add to the sense of disaster, the conversion program
from kerosene to CNG also been a complete failure. Conversion make
sound economic sense given the current expenditure of trillions of
rupiah in subsidies on imported kerosene and the lower cost of CNG.
Again the government has totally mismanaged the
program, in the past few weeks having finally swallowed its pride and
agreed to suspend it. Poor people who received CNG tanks under the
program complained that a high percentage leaked, exacerbating fears
that the cooking fuel is unsafe.
The program is now being handed over to Pertamina, the
agency that shoukd have had the job in the first place, rather than the
Ministry of Cooperatives and Small Enterprises handling outs bits and
pieces to small companies. Finally, it has become clear who is running
this program.
Now that Pertamina is in charge, there is a clear
responsibility, a clearly identified institution that must be called to
account if the program fails in a second time.
Under the original program with the government in
charge, it was not clear who was responsible. Should we ask the
President or the Vice President about a simple conversion program ?
If it is clear who is running a program, it will also
be clear who to blame if the program goes wrong. At the moment, if you
fire a bullet to shoot the culprit, it will inevitably hit the president
and vice president. This is hardly a sensible outcome of what should be
logical devolution of responsibility.
We ask once again, who is in charge in this country ?
If we cannot manage a conversion program like this, how can we run this
enormous country ?
The government is failing in communications and in
coordination. Failure in coordination brings with it the failure of
cooperation. These are management issues that are so fundamental that
they must changed. For a start, when you have a program, make sure you
have someone in charge.
All this time it has been the people of Indonesia who
have been suffering from a severe cost to the economy caused by
incompetent management. They now face a volatile immediate future as the
political parties recognize the weakness of the government.
Business has a right to call on government to act
urgently to improve its management systems. We also urge the political
community to resist using the world of business as a convenient football
with which to score points with one sector of voters or another.
0 Komentar